After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these kinds of systems. Via lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being employed in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs all their capacity to browse these devices and to pursue their right for coverage.
It also demonstrates how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from accessing the channels of cover. It www.ascella-llc.com/what-is-the-due-diligence-data-room/ further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: whilst they assistance to expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.